
Review an error, acknowledge its impact and choose a practical next step without attacking yourself. Work and relationship examples, plus a writing practice.
This material is for informational and educational purposes only and is not medical, psychological, or psychotherapeutic advice. If you are experiencing an acute psychological condition or need professional support, please contact a doctor, psychologist, psychotherapist, or crisis service.
Let’s imagine you have sent a presentation to a client and, ten minutes later, notice the wrong date on the first slide. It is a small error, but a verdict is already forming: “How can I be so careless? I cannot be trusted with serious work.” Instead of sending a brief correction, you reopen the file, check every comma, and imagine people discussing your incompetence. Correcting the slide takes minutes; the conversation with yourself consumes the evening.
Self-criticism often contains a wish to prevent another mistake. You can preserve that concern for quality while exploring which kind of inner conversation actually helps. Begin by noticing the move from a specific event to a judgment of your whole person: the date was wrong, but the conclusion now concerns your right to do your job at all.

A pause between a mistake, self-criticism, and the next action
What the inner critic is trying to prevent
A harsh phrase may appear before someone evaluates your work, before asking for money, or when trying something new. Sometimes its tone feels familiar from the past. Sometimes it becomes louder with tiredness, heavy demands, or actual experience of severe criticism. These circumstances combine differently for different people; the phrase alone cannot establish one shared cause.
Self-blame can create a sense of having taken control: you noticed the problem before anyone else and judged yourself strictly enough. Without a clear correction, however, the tension remains. You return to the same incident even when the thinking no longer produces new information.
In the presentation example, clarify what you fear. Will the client be unable to use the slides? Might they doubt the remaining figures? Or is the possibility of being seen making a mistake itself frightening? Each concern calls for a different response. Repeating “I am terrible at my job” is not enough to provide one.
Feedback you can act on
“The first slide has last year’s date” identifies what to change. “I ruin everything” becomes so broad that it is hard to know where to begin. Try adding three things to the observation: its consequence, an available action, and a way to check the result.
An entry might read: “The version I sent has the wrong date. It has not been used in a meeting yet. I will correct the slide and explain which file is current. Before sending the next presentation, I will check the title page against a short list.” If an error affected someone else’s work, acknowledge that directly and agree a remedy. Self-humiliation tells the affected person neither a deadline nor a solution.
“The inner critic speaks in absolutes. Adult responsibility speaks concretely: here is the mistake, its consequence, and a repair step. Change needs clarity, not humiliation.”

Dmytro Telushko — psychologist, author, and founder of MriyaRun
Why it feels frightening to stop pushing yourself
You may believe that without a severe internal voice you will relax and stop trying, especially if finishing work has previously followed a long period of anxiety. A familiar sequence can begin to look like the only method: frighten yourself first, then work.
Try testing another approach on a small task. Define what will count as a sufficient result, allow time, and arrange a check. Afterwards, compare both quality and the energy it took. One successful experience will not establish a permanent answer, but it will provide something to build on next time.
Across four experiments by Breines and Chen, a self-compassionate response to failure was accompanied by greater improvement motivation on several measures. This challenges the assumption that kindness necessarily undermines effort; it does not promise the same result for everyone.
A situation at home
Let’s imagine another situation. You spoke sharply to someone close, then spent the evening calling yourself a bad partner. Your internal distress is considerable, but the other person still has neither an apology nor a conversation. Describe the action more precisely: “I raised my voice and interrupted. That may have hurt you. I want to apologise and hear what happened for you.”
Then examine the conditions: several nights of insufficient sleep, a hurried conversation, or a request that remained unclear. These observations can inform the next interaction without cancelling responsibility for speaking harshly. You may need to agree a time to talk and notice earlier when listening becomes difficult.
The other person has the right not to feel better immediately. Working on self-criticism should not become a demand for instant forgiveness because you now understand what happened. Repair takes place between people and depends on subsequent actions.
Pausing before reviewing a mistake
During self-criticism, you may notice holding your breath, tensing up, or repeatedly rereading one message. These signs do not establish a cause, but they can alert you that the internal conversation has become difficult. Try putting the screen aside briefly, feeling the support beneath your feet, and looking around. Breathe at a comfortable pace without compulsory breath holds.
After a short pause, ask whether you have enough energy to review the incident. If no urgent action is needed, returning after food or sleep can sometimes be more useful. The Body Journal: Conversation with Yourself offers space to record sensations and circumstances and notice recurring combinations of workload and internal pressure over time.

Body Journal “Conversation with Yourself”
A writing practice: five lines after an error
Choose one specific incident you feel ready to work with. Record the critic’s phrase as it sounds. Beside it, describe the checkable event without “always” or “never.” Name your feeling, the consequences for yourself and others, and one available step. You can finish by noting what support or skill would help you take that step.
For example: “I am hopeless”; “I missed the agreed reply deadline”; “I feel ashamed and anxious”; “the other person could not plan the meeting”; “I will write today, acknowledge the delay, and offer two realistic times.” The entry ends with an action you can take and later check. Feeling instantly confident is not a prerequisite.
If your habitual view of yourself includes only errors, also record completed work, help you received, and efforts that mattered. Self-Esteem Through Gratitude, Part 3 can support this kind of reflection. Gratitude does not require renaming an unpleasant incident as a good one. It leaves the rest of your life in view as well.

A MriyaRun journal focused on gratitude
When to seek support
If self-criticism occupies much of the day, leads you to avoid work and people, comes with persistent hopelessness, or disrupts sleep, discuss it with a psychologist or clinician. If you may harm yourself, seek urgent help from a local emergency or crisis service and someone who can stay with you. You do not have to succeed at helping yourself first to deserve support.
Further ways of noticing and questioning negative beliefs appear in NHS guidance on self-esteem. A small change in your own language can be a beginning: describe today’s mistake in words that make the next step understandable.
- MriyaRun: Journals, MAC Cards and Self-Reflection
- Achieving Goals
- Self-Criticism: From Self-Blame to a Next Step
